sueden.social ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
Eine Community für alle, die sich dem Süden hingezogen fühlen. Wir können alles außer Hochdeutsch.

Serverstatistik:

1,9 Tsd.
aktive Profile

#neoliberalism

5 Beiträge5 Beteiligte2 Beiträge heute

China Miéville has summarized in a few words what should be said about immigration in the West. Anything deviating from this agenda is total crap, in other words, intellectual bullshit made up by hypocrites. If we want to strive for more Democracy, then we should focus on what's really important: A general democratic deficit when it comes to all political and economic issues.

"Anderson says that voters have usually not been consulted about ‘either the arrival or the scale of labour from abroad’. But then, after decades of neoliberalism, what are voters usually consulted about? And on what policies do their opinions have an effect? There is no democratic mandate for almost anything: pouring shit into rivers; declining real wages; the financialisation of public goods; skyrocketing inequality; the destruction of the universities; the underfunding of hospitals; and so endlessly on. To demand that the left should concern itself with the lack of democratic accountability tout court would be welcome, if hardly innovative.
(...)
On immigration, socialist demands should include full labour and civic rights for migrants, full entitlement to benefits, unionisation across the economy, and an undoing of vulnerabilities that contribute to the super-exploitation of migrants.

Clearly immigration is distinct insofar as it is a highly effective wedge issue for the right. And that is something the left must indeed diagnose and confront. But Anderson takes the framing of the ‘problem of immigration’ as a starting point. Which is either to tail the right, or to accept its propaganda."

lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v47/n07/le

London Review of BooksLetters

The Mess – If You Don’t Value Things, You Destroy Them

DRAFT We live under a system, global capitalism, where value is determined not by care, connection, or any collective well-being, but by market logic. If something is not valued in that narrow logic, it is treated as waste. If you don't actively value the alternatives - you will "accidentally" destroy them. This applies to tech, culture, nature, and community.Tech has a problem of misplaced value, people still keep using #mainstreaming tools - the platforms and apps of the #dotcons - […]

hamishcampbell.com/the-mess-if

hamishcampbell.comThe Mess – If You Don’t Value Things, You Destroy Them – Hamish Campbell
Mehr von Hamish Campbell
#blocking#deathcult#dotcons

Tell me about it...

"The real breaking point is fairly simple: the higher up you go at a company, the further you are from problems or purpose. Everything is abstract — the people that work for you, the people you work for, and even the tasks you do.

We train people — from a young age! — to generalize and distance oneself from actual tasks, to aspire to doing managerial work, because managers are well-paid and "know what's going on," even if they haven't actually known what was going on for years, if they ever did so. This phenomenon has led to the stigmatization of blue-collar work (and the subsequent evisceration of practical trade and technical education across most of the developed world) in favor of universities. Society respects an MBA more than a plumber, even though the latter benefits society more — though I concede that both roles involve, on some level, shit, with the plumber unblocking it and the MBA spewing it.

Sidebar: Hey, have you noticed how most of the calls for people to return to the office come not from people who actually do the jobs, but occupy managerial roles? More on that later.

I believe this process has created a symbolic society — one where people are elevated not by any actual ability to do something or knowledge they may have, but by their ability to make the right noises and look the right way to get ahead. The power structures of modern society are run by business idiots — people that have learned enough to impress the people above them, because the business idiots have had power for decades. They have bred out true meritocracy or achievement or value-creation in favor of symbolic growth and superficial intelligence, because real work is hard, and there are so many of them in power they've all found a way to work together.

I need you to understand how widespread this problem is, because it is why everything feels fucking wrong."

wheresyoured.at/the-era-of-the

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At · The Era Of The Business IdiotFair warning: this is the longest thing I've written on this newsletter. I do apologize. Soundtrack: EL-P - $4 Vic Listen to my podcast Better Offline. We have merch. Last week, Bloomberg profiled Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, revealing that he's either a liar or a specific kind of idiot. The

The right hates the Postal Service because it's a big, unionized public agency that proves government can actually work—and they can’t stand that. They’d rather privatize it to help corporations profit and weaken worker power.

It’s not about #USPS’s efficiency or viability. It’s about equity and collective good, values that are anathema to predatory #capitalism.

#labor #neoliberalism
znetwork.org/znetarticle/why-t

Yep. I also suspected it was a bit on the Poppish Intellectual History, especially when compared to Philip Mirowski and Wolfgang Streeck...

"Slobodian’s​ story is fascinating, but the problem with his account is that he doesn’t much want to explore how the ideas he describes found their way into the mainstream, or what else had to happen to make that possible. He is content with tracking the ideas back to their sources and pursuing them across the obscure university departments, cranky newsletters and weird work outings where they first got going. He has a colourful cast of characters – like the bouffant-haired Peter Brimelow, who started out as a fairly standard Thatcherite in the UK and ended up in the US as a white supremacist, or Murray Rothbard, who went from paleolibertarianism to promoting David Duke and Holocaust denial – but after a while they are hard to tell apart. It’s difficult to get a sense of which ideas mattered most, which alliances gained real traction, which people knew what they were doing politically and which of them didn’t really care. The neoliberal origins of the populist right are treated as though they existed in a kind of ideological vacuum, the various ideas tumbling down on top of each other as we repeatedly discover that some bad people knew plenty of people who were even worse.
(...)
Slobodian has an interesting thesis about the way Hayek’s ideas got turned inside out, but it feels overdetermined and undertheorised. Hayek’s Bastards is a short book – 176 pages – yet it has 52 pages of notes and a 38-page bibliography. Something is out of whack here."

lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v47/n09/da

London Review of Books · David Runciman · Hokey Cowboy: Is Hayek to blame?Hayek suspected that nothing about the vindication of neoliberalism was likely to be straightforward. Some magical...

#anaheim #urbanplanning #fail
Across the road is a new housing complex—row houses with small garden, garden wall, a gate, three steps down to the public sidewalk. (The units have rear garages.) developers & city ignored bus stop (goes to train/metro station)on that corner. Riders sitting on the walls and steps. There’s a space between two corner buildings water main as close to the sidewalk as possible. No bench no shelter no trash can. No room to add one. #neoliberalism

Fortgeführter Thread

I went to town to find trousers. One pair of jeans, one pyjama bottoms or similar.

I hit up the thrift/charity stores first. I wasn't hopeful because they never seem to have anything for my body type, but being the anti-consumerism sib that I am, I always want to give it a shot.

Thrift stores were a bust. I headed straight to TK Maxx, because cheap. The cheapest they had, which felt would survive a few seasons at least, were £55. Diesel brand, okay, but those were the cheapest.

Pissed, I left to get more tea from the tea shop, and then walked back to the other side of the city to go to the middle-class department store M&S to find jeans. Since they've been hacked recently, I couldn't look online to find prices. But because of that, maybe they would have deals.

I braced myself, and found two pairs of trousers for the price of the TK Maxx Diesel jeans. One pair of Wranglers and one linen pants because they're soft and comfy and airy.

The department store's underpants were more expensive than their jeans! 3-pack of basic undies (briefs), £35. Wrangler jeans, £23.

"Everything is taken into account. The manufacture, the materials, the shipping..."

Yeah, I get that, you Neoliberal cum stains, but nowhere on this dying earth should well-made branded jeans cost more than a basic pack of tighty whities.

Wow, I'm still pissy about this. It's just weird to me.

If a vaguely intelligent person can't make sense of your pricing, can we just agree y'all just make it all up?